The war on sustainable sustenance and destroyed food infrastructure is the reason why so many people in the world remain hungry? We’ll show you how the powerful interests of large companies and governments prevent production and distribution of food – it’s time to start the battle against hunger! The war on food is a fight we can no longer afford to lose, it is on our doorstep, supermarket shelves, and in our refrigerators. We must take a stand against the corporations that are destroying our food supply, paying close attention to globalist groups like the World Economic Forum offering up solutions for problems they create. The war on food is a battle that we all need to fight as it is costing us all dearly in terms of our health and our wallets.
Post Index
When you do your grocery shopping, have you noticed anything different lately? Are some things just not available? Is the bill borderline ridiculous upon checkout? Reading this article will grant you a better understanding of the global push for synthetic meat and why the World Economic Forum (WEF)is talking about eating bugs. This article has information about the destruction of food processing plants. Why are farmers around the world protesting the regulation of nitrogen emissions, drastically decreasing production of food? Details on Bill Gates’ grab for farmlands also lie within this article, did you know Gates also deals in genetic modification of global seed stocks? Also discussed in this article is the normalization of cannibalism as seen in a recent New York Times article, Hollywood, and beyond.
1. Synthetic Insect Meat
2. Insect-Based Protein
3. Insect Burgers
4. Insect-Based Foods
5. Bug-Based Eating
6. Insect Farming
7. Sustainable Insects
8. Insect Cuisine
9. Insect Food Production
10. Entomophagy
The WEF and Klaus Schwab are hot to trot with the idea of getting humans to move to consuming Insect-Based Protein. Using the fear based climate emergency the WEF claims that bugs emit less harmful greenhouse gasses than more mainstream farm animals. Cattle farming, for example, produces 2.8 kg of greenhouse gas per kilo of live body weight. Insect Farming, on the other hand, produce just 2 grams. Also, so called experts claim that Insect Farming is less resource dependent, consuming for each kilo they weigh 1.7 kg of feed, while cattle farming on the other hand need 10 kg. Yet some factors are missed when evaluation the production impacts of these different forms of sustainable sustenance.
It turns out that insects are being placed in chips and cookies as we speak, meet “Chirps” claiming to be:
“GOOD FOR THE PLANET
Including crickets in your diet is one of the most impactful ways you can reduce the amount of destruction you inflict on the environment.”
“GOOD FOR YOU
Turns out crickets are an excellent source of protein, fiber, prebiotics, amino acids and more. Shocked?”
“THE FUTURE OF FOOD
From breaking the world record for the world’s largest nachos (with a crickety twist) to making a deal with Mark Cuban on Shark Tank, we’ve come a long way from those early days when even our friends wouldn’t try our products. And now? We’re committed to changing the landscape of the food industry, one cricket chip or smoothie at a time. But don’t just take our word for it (we’re biased).”
Other corporate powers are pushing for synthetic meats (in vitro meat, plant-based meat, cultivated meat, lab-grown meat). These “beyond meats” are a popular example of this industry gaining a real foothold in the food industry, having worked its way into not only supermarkets but as an alleged healthier alternative at many fast food and other restaurants. But are they really healthier for you?
The phenomenon of food processing plants being destroyed in record numbers started to become noticeable in 2019, the trend continued though 2020/2021 and has reached an insane level in 2022.
Below is the list of America’s 98 plants that have been destroyed, damaged or impacted by “accidental fires,” disease, or general causes as of June 2022. Looking around, I was not able to fine any destructions after that date … perhaps, if someone was working towards some twisted goal, they accomplished what they had set out to do.
The fallout of these events will be felt for years to come, it is hard to imagine the full impact these losses will create. Coincidentally, at the same time, some mega corporate AI automated corporate food processing plants are opening up. Do you believe in coincidences.
One aspect of the move towards so-called sustainable energy is the lockstep war against farmers, cutting allowed nitrogen in fertilizers and looking to reduce numbers of prevalent livestock. Citing environmental impact from the combined excrement of large groups of livestock, the Dutch government has imposed extreme regulations cutting allowed nitrogen use by 30% during 2022, with a 50% reduction goal set for 2030. While super polluter countries like China can make arbitrary long term goals of reduction in emissions, farmers around the world are expected to adjust in real time.
According to the World Economic Forum:
“Researchers have shown how nitrogen fertilizer could be produced more sustainably. A combination of approaches, including electrifying fertilizer production by using water electrolysis, could help decarbonize the industry, they say. Decarbonizing fertilizer production would in many cases reduce price shock vulnerability and increase food security. India, Brazil, China, France, Turkey and Germany are particularly vulnerable to price shocks in the natural gas and nitrogen markets, say the researchers.”
What the WEF’s analysis fails to illustrate is the immediate impact on food production that such a drastic reduction in the use of nitrogen will have – reducing vegetable yields but by region, similar to the mandated nitrogen reduction. Similar to the truckers’ movement, there is a new group rising up to stand against injustice resulting from the arrogance of the mandates and failed central planning that is being pushed by the self-proclaimed global elite. Due to the previously mentioned nitrogen reduction policy set by the Dutch government, local farmers are protesting. New regulations that claim to focus on cutting nitrogen emissions, will also result in a 30% reduction in cattle populations. Additionally, other farmers throughout Europe and other countries are coming out in numbers against this globalist agenda.
Bill Gates and other billionaire types have been on a purchasing spree, buying up farmland across the U.S. and in other areas around the world. This is concerning given Gates’s previous comment about reducing the global human population and the history he has with interference in the farming and agriculture industry in India and Africa.
The New York Post did a story on this in February 2021, citing the research of Eric O’keefe who was looking into a mysterious purchase of 14,500 acres. O’Keefe knew Gates had been acquiring farmland for years, mostly through various Cascade subsidiaries.
“The mogul’s holdings include large tracts in Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, California, and about a dozen other states. With the Washington state acreage and other recent additions to his portfolio, O’Keefe calculated, Gates now owns at least 242,000 acres of American farmland.”
“Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, has an alter ego,” O’Keefe wrote: “Farmer Bill, the guy who owns more farmland than anyone else in America.”
A New York Times article published July 23, 2022 (A Taste for Cannibalism) discusses the normalization of cannibalism as seen in recent movies and other media. This is nothing new looking back at characters like Hannibal Lecter in Silence of the Lambs, who’s character was, while renowned for intelligence, firmly characterized as a villain. The difference seems to be in that characterization, what was once portrayed as villainous and vile is now romanticized with several attempts at justification.
I remember other movies where the act of cannibalism arose out of life and death necessity. A good example is “Alive” a 1993 American biographical survival drama film based on Piers Paul Read’s: The Story of the Andes Survivors, which details a Uruguayan rugby team’s crash aboard Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571 into the Andes mountains on October 13, 1972. Where, much like the Donnor party story, people resorted to cannibalism in a eat or die scenario. As you will see in the examples below we have come a long way to how cannibalism is conceptually presented, or normalized as previously stated.
“Tender Is the Flesh,” released in English in 2020 and in Spanish in 2017, imagines a future society that farms humans like cattle. Also out in 2017, “Raw,” a film by the director and screenwriter Julia Ducournau, tells the story of a vegetarian veterinary student whose taste for meat escalates after consuming raw offal. “Bones and All,” starring Timothée Chalamet amis a movie about a young love that becomes a lust for human consumption was described by its director Luca Guadagnino, calling the story “extremely romantic.”
What before was portrayed as “villainous” “vile” or “life and death,” is now dramatized in terms like “raw,” “lust,” and “extremely romantic.” Is the the precipitation of shock value guiding content creation? If sex and violence are what sells, is the pinnacle combination of the two encapsulated in the romanticism of cannibalism?
However some might argue that the examples above are all fictional, having no real world impact. An argument that falls flat on its face when taking a closer look at Hollywood, where this fictional normalization has been mimicked and industrialized in cosmetic culinary endeavors. A 2014 LA Times article Covered A now defunct start up named Bite Labs, which claimed to make human test to meet from cloned celebrity tissue.
“At the moment, our primary goal is to provoke discussion and debate around topics of bioethics and celebrity culture,” said Martin from the BiteLabs team. He says he wishes to remain anonymous at this time, due to the controversy surrounding the focus of the company. “We see inefficiencies, environmental hazards, and ethical problems in the world’s food production and distribution. There are exciting opportunities to disrupt these industries while opening new ways to consume celebrity culture.”
In conclusion, food insecurity is a global issue that affects everyone. While making sure we use our resources efficiently, we should be cautious about where our food comes from and the trust we put in the World Economic Forum’s advice when it comes to edible bugs. We can make a difference in the fight against food insecurity, but it starts with us becoming more independent. Let’s take action now and protect our right to eat safe and nutritious food by building local networks that bypass unsavory corporate commodity gangsters.
Thinking about all of this together, if you can do so without getting too sick, there is just too much for what could be mere coincidence. It appears to be calculated and coordinated. The idea that what we are seeing just happened naturally is an insult to most intelligent people, especially when thinking about the text on the now destroyed Georgia Guide Stones that instructed humanity to keep its population below 500 million people.
0 Comments