In the safest and most secure election of all time, many questions of safety and security were brought forward by thousands of people across our nation. Not on the news in some worthless statement with no penalty for lying, but through sworn affidavits of fact under the penalty of perjury which promises 5 years in prison for a false submission. The Center Square reported:
Post Index
“Hundreds of people concerned about the integrity of the November 2020 election gathered outside the Michigan Capitol delivering roughly 7,000 affidavits claiming fraud and demanding a forensic audit.”
The Center Square
This contrast between unchained media lies vs penalty of perjury sworn affidavits asks a powerful question. Do we assume higher credibility to statements of celebrities/media personalities, who suffer no consequences for lying, or that of average American citizens putting their livelihoods on the line to speak the truth?
Still the media has dubbed 2020 the safest and most secure election of all time, despite being widely known by people around the world to be anything but that. Branding anyone who dares speak of it, or even debate the legitimacy of available information, “right wing conspiracy theorist.” There are many reasons why the statement is propaganda and far from any semblance of Truth. First hand experience is how many people are aware of the heavy-handed censorship witnessed in various social media platforms.
Thankfully, information is finally beginning to come out that reflects this personal experience that so many of us were challenged with, not that information was not coming out before, just that now the data is coming out in so many places it is getting difficult for the powers-that-be to ignore or suppress.
The concept that Twitter is controlled, manipulated, or otherwise influenced by the heavy hand of government agencies and specific politicians is not altogether new, having been previously revealed in a lawsuit filed by then US Senate candidate, Dr. Shiva Ayyaurai. Shiva filed a federal lawsuit independently alleging his federal civil rights were violated. In the process of seeing this case through, Dr. Shiva discovered Twitter’s “partner support portal,” as reported by the Gateway Pundit.
“Dr. Shiva discovered that Twitter built a special portal offered to certain governmental entities so that government officials can flag and delete content they dislike for any reason, as part of what they call their “Twitter Partner Status.”
GATEWAY PUNDIT
This case was a breakthrough in many ways. Some observing the lawsuit claimed the judge was showing signs of ending Twitter’s CDA 230 exemption. This, if it manifested, would mean they could no longer hide under the claim of being a private company. This is a tactic giving companies like Twitter and Facebook a means to dismiss lawsuits while simultaneously providing the ability to conduct business with impunity, preventing and deflecting most all legal challenges with which they are posed.
Being one of the first cases to validate the information many people had already known to be true, Dr. Shiva’s case brought significant attention to the fact that discussions of election irregularities might very well be more conspiracy fact than conspiracy theory. Another impressive finding in Shiva’s court proceedings is the identification of the infrastructure in which this government and big tech collusion took place. It details connections between multiple government agencies and several corporations and other organizations.
Some takeaways from this discovery include:
“The Defendants in this case were architects of this infrastructure. The Defendants and their allies co-authored the foundational documents – The Playbooks – at Harvard’s Belfer Center for Defending Digital Democracy”
“The Long Fuse Report documents that at that time, the infrastructure co-architected by these Defendants was being only used to surveil him and actively analyze his ‘influence and reach’ to gauge his threat severity”
“Defendants failed to disclose to the Court the existence of the Playbooks setting out the means by which they were to regulate speech on social media”
In late 2022 new information on the 2020 election is coming out rapidly, with Elon Musk releasing internal emails and other files from Twitter which show how – at the direction of the US government – the Hunter Biden laptop story was suppressed and labeled as Russian disinformation. For many people this is not breaking news, it is a known truth. Even though it is known truth we have lived with, in daily discussions over the past couple of years, we have been passionately refuted by others and constantly shamed at large for believing as a part of a collection of conspiracy theories.
A day after releasing the now infamous “Twitter files,” Elon Musk said the social media platform’s censorship of Hunter Biden’s laptop story is the “definition of election interference.”
“If Twitter is doing one team’s bidding before an election, shutting down dissenting voices on a pivotal election, that is the definition of election interference.”
“Frankly Twitter was acting like an arm of the Democratic National Committee, it was absurd.”
“This is not a North Korea tour guide situation, you get to go anywhere you want, whenever you want, however you want. I’m not controlling the narrative.”
“It’s just obvious there’s been a lot of control of information, suppression of information, including things that affected elections, and that just all need to be … you just want to have the stuff out there.”
ELON MUSK, TWITTER CEO RE: Twitter Files, Election Fraud
The story, as told by Matt Taibbi, reports a controlled structured system of revised tweets, claiming that both parties had a direct relationship with Twitter’s team. Taibbi also suggests that the reviews done by the Twitter team more often than not, displayed unbalanced means of arbitrating censorship, more frequently favoring democrat campaigns. In telling this story, Taibbi has come under fire, like many other journalists who dare speak against the favored narrative.
In the second drop of Twitter files, new information reveals the term “shadow banning” – formerly labeled as a conspiracy theory, like so many other developing subjects – turns out to be based in fact. Shadow banning is described as secret blacklists, where selected individuals are filtered as to the reach of information they put out or even as to how searchable the content they put out will be.
“A new [Twitter Files] investigation exposes that teams of Twitter personnel establish blacklists, block disfavored tweets from trending, and deliberately restrict the visibility of individual accounts or even hot topics in private without alerting users.”
“Take, for example, Stanford’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) who argued that Covid lockdowns would harm children. Twitter secretly placed him on a “Trends Blacklist,” which prevented his tweets from trending. https://t.co/qTW22Zh691”
“Site Integrity Policy, Policy Escalation Support” (SIP-PES), which was made up of Twitter officials, including former legal director Vijaya Gadde, Trust & Safety chief Yoel Roth, and CEOs Jack Dorsey and Parag Agrawal, “and others.”
BARI WEISS TWITTER THREAD
Here we go!! 🍿🍿 https://t.co/eILK9f3bAm
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 2, 2022
The Twitter Files, Part Deux!! 🍿🍿 https://t.co/bH9UiTSEK2
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2022
The Twitter Files, Part 3
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 10, 2022
Deplatforming the President https://t.co/nvdlRNYXxA
As of December 8, 2022, James Baker is no longer an attorney for Twitter in light of concerns about Baker’s possible role in suppression of information important to the public dialogue.
When the first installment of the Twitter files were published, there was an expectation that more information would be published over the weekend, the reason this did not occur was a result of actions taken by deputy general counsel and former FBI general counsel Jim Baker.
Baker was fired for secretly vetting the first batch of Twitter files, without knowledge of New Management.
“Matt Taibbi, the journalist who first broke the news of Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files” revealed that the company’s top lawyer had “vetted” what information was shared without the knowledge of the new boss.”
Fox news December 6th 2022:
“While revealing internal discussions over how to explain Twitter’s suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story during the 2020 election, Baker told his colleagues “I support the conclusion that we need more facts to assess whether the materials were hacked” but added “it’s reasonable for us to assume that they may have been and that caution is warranted.”
As stated by Matt Taibbi, it was Bari Weiss ( Former NYT columnist) who discovered the person in charge of releasing the first batch of Twitter files. Taibbi stated,
“My jaw hit the floor, the first batch of files both reporters received was marked ‘Spectra Baker emails'”
Matt Taibbi
Baker is a controversial figure, being center stage in several FBI controversies dating back to 2016, and known for their involvement in Steele dossier (AKA Trump–Russia dossier), to the Alpha Bank, as well as their subsequent resignation in 2018 from the FBI. All of which have been debunked as fake/manufactured, now known as conspiracy fact not fiction. Below are some 2019 comments from Baker supporting the russiagate hoax, as reported by CNN.
“The Papadopoulos information is what triggered us going down this path,” Baker said. “… It would have been a dereliction of our duty not to investigate this information.”
“The investigation was not predicated on the basis of the information that (British spy) Christopher Steele gave to us in the form of the dossier,” Baker said. “That is just not – was not my understanding at the time and has never been my understanding. Just to say that, flat out.”
“We’re not stupid, the FBI. People roll in to give us information all the time, from all kinds of different angles … all kinds of stuff. People come to us for lots of different reasons,” Baker said. “So, the FBI has an obligation to both take that seriously and be highly skeptical of the information as well.”
JAMES BAKER, FORMER TOP FBI AGENT
Testifying to a republican attorney general this first week of December 2022, an FBI agent revealed that during the 2020 presidential elections big tech companies in silicon valley would meet weekly with the FBI. Attorneys Jeff Landry (Louisiana) and Eric Schmitt (Missouri) deposed FBI supervisory special agent Elvis Chan in a Biden administration lawsuit.
While being deposed, Chan stated that he, the FBI foreign influence task force, infrastructure and cyber security officials interacted with multiple social media companies advising them of election disinformation from Russia.
One detail noted by the GOP AG was the August 26th Joe Rogan podcast, featuring Mark Zuckerberg. In which Zuckerberg relayed that the FBI had identified a pattern of disinformation with links to Russia, also that without specifically saying so that the Hunter Biden laptop story fit this pattern.
Other comments revealed the following:
Chan from the FBI says:
“The companies I remember attending the meetings are Facebook, Microsoft, Google, Twitter, Yahoo, Verizon Media, and Wiki Incorporated.”
“The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities.”
“On information and belief, the FBI’s reference to a ‘dump’ of information was a specific reference to the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop, which was already in the FBI’s possession.”
“It is not based on the content of any particular message or narrative. Private sector entities independently make decisions about what, if any, action they take on their platforms and for their customers after the FBI has notified them.”
It is no surprise the Twitter files being released reveal FBI involvement in the scandal, it has become all the trend just as seen in Governor Whitmer’s kidnapping which involved 12 assets. It is also known that there was some level of FBI involvement in the January 6th event at our nation’s capital, with many questions revolving around Ray Epps and whether or not he is an FBI informant.
Additionally, the raid which recently occurred at Trump’s Mar-A-Lago residence in Florida, has provided no real details on the nature of the warrant that led to the raid and has left many questions as to why other former presidents get to keep information and documents in even less secure locations.
Thinking back to the 2020 election and what followed, another means of suppressing or censoring information occurred within our legal system. You might recall that any and all legal cases regarding election fraud or other election-related items were dismissed as right-wing conspiracies before even being heard. The most common reason given was that the claimants themselves “lacked standing,” being that a party must show an “injury in fact” to their own legal interests. The following case, brought by RALAND J BRUNSON (Petitioner), specifies exactly how parties were injured and what legal claims were compromised.
In late October 2022, a case came before The United States Supreme Court and they chose to accept it – the gravity of this case and their decision to accept this case and not kick it to the side speaks volumes to the problems our country is facing. This case is also focused on the 2020 elections, by calling out all members of Congress, who pushed for certification, as traitors and demands they be removed from office for their actions.
This case is largely based on the response of government agents following the 2020 election to a lawsuit brought by senator Ted Cruz. After the inconsistencies in the 2020 election, Ted Cruz, Senator from the State of Texas, brought forward a lawsuit based on an 1876 Supreme Court ruling regarding elections and foreign interference. The requested that 10 days be taken to review evidence and determine if foreign interference had significant effect on the election.
This case is a very simple case regarding the legality of actions taken by the following people: Congress, the House of Representatives, the Senate and Vice President Pence. Were they required to do this 10-day investigation that Ted Cruz asked to be performed? Was that request a lawful, legitimate appropriate request, if so and they refuse to do it that would be a treasonous act? If you’re not protecting the Constitution with the citizens right’s in mind, you do not qualify to hold an elected office.
Below are some excerpts from text within the case documentation:
This action is against 388 federal officers in their official capacities which include President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard Pence. (“Respondents”). All the Respondents have taken the required Oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and as such they are liable for consequences when they violate the Oath of Office.
The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and This 4 fraud by Respondents. A successfully rigged election has the same end result as an act of war; to place into power whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and courts of law.
Brunson’s complaint alleges fraud, violations of the Oath of Office and touches on acts of treason committed by the Respondents. These serious offenses need to be addressed immediately with the least amount of technical nuances of the law and legal procedures because these offenses are flowing continually against Brunson’s liberties and life and consequently is a continual national security breach.
Voting is the greatest power an individual can exercise in a Republic; it is Brunson’s personal voice and the way he can protect his personal constitutional protected rights and the U.S. Constitution. See ^ 71 of the Complaint. When the allegations of a rigged election came forward, the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office.
Much like the information surrounding the hunter Biden laptop story, the mainstream media and social media have shown an aversion to covering this supreme Court case. Yet another instance of information being suppressed, but for how long will people who still watch the news categorize this as just another right-wing conspiracy theory?
How dumb will the media look if they fail to report on this important story and suddenly in the near future 300 and some odd members of government no longer hold office?
Perhaps the information surrounding the mere existence of this case presents too many questions, questions that shed legitimate doubt on “the safest and most secure election of all time” as they say. It seems to be reminiscent of the Time Magazine article “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election”, discussing the cooperation between multiple organizations to ensure Trump’s defeat.
Except now, with all the information being presented in the Twitter Files, many deeper and possibly sinister layers of conspiracy will continue to be exposed in Twitter Files Leak 3,4,5,6,7 and so on! One can only guess what Elon Musk has up his sleeve. At any rate the Lost Coast Populist team of citizen journalists and myself will continue to bring you the inside scoop to this and other developments in the local, state, and national arena. Until then, please leave your comments on this and related subject matter in the comment area below. Thank you so much for reading and for your support!
Excellent work Ash 👏 👍 👌